The implied social contract that has long existed between
larger companies and their workers is evolving.
Often described (by company leaders, at least) as like that of ‘families’,
the relationship between individual employees and firms has typically been defined
in terms of short-term performance and behavioral targets and the rewards or
sanctions that can result. In many
places, this relationship has become increasingly one-sided, with mounting
obligations of service and performance for individual employees but few
corresponding obligations besides financial compensation to the employee by the
firm.
Recognizing that lack of reciprocity and mutual benefit in
the relationship between employees and firms, many leaders are increasingly
developing innovative workplace policies and practices. Some of these involve radical restructuring
of corporations themselves, as Tony Hsieh has pursued at Zappo’s by shifting
authority from hierarchy to ‘holacracy’, a fractal and democratic governance
system focused on a specific purpose (like customer service). Others have similarly rethought the central
activity of organizational decision-making, like at Dark Horse, the
Berlin-based design firm, where ‘sociocracy’, or so-called circular organizing
among equals, relies on consent rather than autocrat governance. More generally, as Richard Sheridan captures
in Joy, Inc. (Portfolio 2013), his inspiring account of Menlo
Innovations, the imperative for many leaders today is to instill more flexibility
and agility in their management of talent as a way to foster a happier and (hence)
more productive workplace.
As these examples suggest, many current and prominent
attempts are at newer and smaller businesses, where experimentation and
thoroughgoing change are perceived to be easier to implement. In The Alliance, the new book written
by LinkedIn Chairman and co-founder Reid Hoffman, Ben Cosnacha and Chris Yeh, the
guiding argument is that talent development and management need to be
reconsidered and recast across businesses of all sizes and ages and in all
industries and sectors. The familiar macro-level
drivers of such reworking include sweeping changes in the economy, blurring of
industry boundaries, and transformations of talent markets. Yet what is more compelling in the call of
Hoffman and his co-authors is their practical and hands-on approach to engaging
and empowering employees in order to enable mutual value creation benefitting
both individual talents and the firm.
At the heart of the book is the idea of a ‘tour of duty’ for
individual employees. Hoffman recounts
using this approach at LinkedIn to get beyond conventional talk about loyalty
or commitment and instead to agree upon specific terms with employees for deals
lasting two to four years. The LinkedIn
tours replaced open-ended arrangements that might have included fixed-term
contracts but did not acknowledge the rhythms of growth and development experienced
by both employee and company. These more
traditional arrangements also tended to leave vague or unspoken the
expectations of both sides about the future and, especially, the possibility of
continuing association. Crucially, tours
of duty recognize that after a given tour, individual employees often better
serve themselves and the company by going elsewhere. Rather than being a source of insecurity or
instability, the transparent and shared understanding of what individual and
firm can expect from each other, and for how long, powerfully engenders trust
and encourages greater productivity and well-being.
No one model or approach fits all talent situations or
organizations, of course, and one of the strengths of the book is that the
‘tour of duty’ model is both itself flexible and one of several options for
shoring up and enhancing relationships between individual employees and
businesses. Recognizing that ‘stars’ are
different from other employees or that age and industry variations may warrant
different treatment, for example, may be intuitively obvious but are also often
difficult steps for leaders to implement when dealing with real people. Both in the main text and in several
concretely helpful appendices, which offer sample statements of alliance as
well as exercises on how to ensure alignment of individual and organizational
expectations and goals, Hoffman and his co-authors illuminate the practical
steps that leaders can take to design, launch and sustain successful talent
management alliances.
What finally distinguishes The Alliance, however, is
its attention to the broader contexts of the networked age indicated in the
subtitle. However provocative and
practically useful to individual leaders and employees in dealing with each
other more openly and reciprocally, the book recognizes how far-reaching is the
potential of optimizing internal company as well as external networks for
growth. Put differently, while the alliance
between individual talent and company may be a productive breakthrough for
both, even more consequential are the individual and industry networks that today
enable unprecedented connections between people, ideas and opportunities. These connections provide the basis for
individuals and companies to invest in each other and develop mutually defined
and beneficial relationships. Thanks to
the excellent work of Hoffman, Casnocha and Yeh, we now have a clear,
insightful and practically-oriented guide to building new and network-supported
alliances with talent that have the potential to transform our leadership, our
employees, and our businesses.
No comments:
Post a Comment